|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 2, 2011 23:14:21 GMT
Does anyone else compare, Sunshine?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2011 23:18:30 GMT
Julie Andrews not in acting per say, but in talent. Kate has certainly delivered amazing performances, but can anyone say they expected the Meryl to Miranda transformation? That was well done. With Julia Child, she had a show to base her impersonation off of so that wasn't as good to me. The Devil Wears Prada was epic.
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 2, 2011 23:28:46 GMT
Hey, no disrespect for Meryl. I love Meryl! She reigns queen. But when she retires, Kate will carry on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2011 23:40:43 GMT
How many movies has Kate been in?
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 3, 2011 1:24:09 GMT
Quite a bit. I've seen the majority of them lol
|
|
|
Post by megster1992 on Feb 3, 2011 1:42:18 GMT
I bet you have JT.
|
|
|
Post by azb on Feb 3, 2011 2:04:38 GMT
By 'majority' she really means every one she's ever been in, ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 2:12:26 GMT
And any movie Kate has considered being in, just so she could imagine how much better Kate would have been instead of the hired actress.
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 3, 2011 2:22:30 GMT
You all know me too well. Love it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 2:37:16 GMT
Uh, that was true? I was just kidding...
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 3, 2011 3:11:39 GMT
Right. Because I'm never ever sarcastic. Ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 3:15:47 GMT
Haven't we already discussed the possibility of instating a universal sarcasm sign? Maybe that should be revisited.
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 3, 2011 3:27:13 GMT
Yeah, someone should definitely get on that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 3:29:20 GMT
nose goes! *puts finger on nose*
|
|
|
Post by JocelynTorrent on Feb 3, 2011 3:34:37 GMT
any way to shorten that?
|
|